Most agentic procurement is a black box. Perspix runs evaluation work — and shows its reasoning, its sources, and its trail. Built in Europe, on infrastructure you control.
WorldCC has tracked it for a decade: the average enterprise loses 11% of contract value after signature. Top performers hold it to 3%. McKinsey puts the gap in the same range — and traces most of it to evaluations no one had time to do properly.
On €500M of addressable spend, that's €40M no one is looking for.
McKinsey reviewed 340,000 procurement initiatives across $200B of spend. The average savings pipeline loses 33% in planning, another 20% in execution. By the time the number reaches your board, more than half of it is gone — and the slide doesn't say where.
Your last savings target wasn't ambitious. It was already half-spent before you presented it.
In June 2025, Microsoft told the French Senate under oath that it cannot guarantee EU data is safe from US government access. The CLOUD Act overrides every "sovereign cloud" label your hyperscaler sells you. Tolerable in 2020. In 2026, it's a board risk with a clock on it.
The day your auditor asks where your sourcing decisions live, the answer needs to already be "here."
Three exposures. One balance sheet. Your competitors are already moving — and McKinsey found that not a single program in the slowest quartile ever hit its two-year savings target. Not one.
The McKinsey/WEF Lighthouse benchmark, replicated across multiple deployments: tender evaluation time cut by 67%, negotiation savings up 281%, on the same headcount. Bid cycles that ran for weeks now close in an afternoon. Your sourcing team stops grinding matrices and starts running the strategic categories you've been promising the board for two years.
More events go to competitive tender instead of single-source rollover — where Hackett finds Digital World Class procurement organizations book 2× the savings as a percentage of spend. Every number on the slide traces back to a line in the matrix. Finance signs off the first time. The 11% leakage gap stops being a number you tolerate and starts being a number you report against.
Every award arrives with its evidence trail attached: scoring matrix, bid responses, reasoning, version history. Audit, board, regulator, losing bidder challenge — the answer is already in the file, ready before the question is asked. And because Perspix runs entirely on European infrastructure, on-prem or in your private cloud, exposure three closes the day you deploy.
Your specifications, templates, and legal constraints become a structured, weighted scoring matrix — the single source of truth that every bid in the process will be measured against, line by line.
The agent scores each bid against the matrix and explains the reasoning behind every judgment. One click opens the original document with the exact passage highlighted — no hunting, no black box.
Pick the requirements that matter most and put up to three evaluated proposals side-by-side. Deltas are highlighted, scores trace back to the source, and the award decision is defensible.
Three ways in. Pick the one that sounds like you.
You get the full Perspix capability — sourcing events, evaluation, defensible audit trail — operated by us on your infrastructure. No platform team to staff, no version upgrades to manage, named support when something matters. Your sourcing function gets agentic procurement without standing up a single engineer.
Book a working session →You've already invested in a custom procurement platform. Engine plugs the agentic evaluation layer in behind it — scoring, defensible reasoning, the same audit trail — without touching your UX or your data model. Your users see your product. Your product is now agentic.
Talk to engineering →You've built the relationships, the vertical expertise, and the brand. We're not interested in any of that. Engine ships as a white-labelled core inside your product — your UX, your data, your commercial relationship. We don't talk to your customers. We don't appear in your contracts. We don't compete in your vertical. You ship agentic capabilities your customers are asking for; we stay the infrastructure underneath.
Talk to engineering →AWS European Sovereign Cloud and Microsoft Cloud for Sovereignty are still subject to the CLOUD Act, FISA 702, and US executive orders — regardless of where the data physically sits. Perspix is built differently, at three levels.
An EU entity, an EU board, no foreign capital with control rights. EU-resident engineering and operations staff — the people with production access live under the same laws as your data.
A deployment that runs in your own physical data center. Hyperscaler-optional, not hyperscaler-locked. No required external APIs, no third-party kill-switch in the White House.
A model-agnostic architecture. Run Perspix on open-weight models, your internal LM service, or commercial APIs — your call. Swap the model without re-platforming.
A US subsidiary in Germany is not sovereignty. Neither is a stack that runs on US hyperscaler services. Sovereignty is data under European law, operations under European control, and technology you can swap on your terms. That's Perspix.
Perspix runs on your infrastructure because our team built the techniques that make it possible. Not a roadmap, not a partnership — peer-reviewed work at NeurIPS and ICLR, the top venues in machine learning.
A live walkthrough on your real procurement scenario — not a canned deck, not a sales pitch.
A Perspix engineer or founder. Not an SDR. Ask the hard questions and get real answers.
A clear read on fit, deployment path, and next steps before we hang up. Yes or no, either works.
No form gauntlet. No phone number required. Just pick a time.